Apply here
Apply here

Lawsuit Loans and Pre-Settlement Funding In Montana

Montana: pre-settlement legal funding effectively unavailable.

Montana’s regulations effectively turn pre-settlement funding into a traditional bank loan by capping rates at only 15% per year. No litigation funder will accept the high risk of a lawsuit outcome for bank-level returns, so virtually every funding company has stopped operating in the state.

This gives insurance companies a clear win: injured plaintiffs have no access to cash advances while their cases are pending and are forced to accept lowball settlements due to financial pressure. Banks themselves do not offer these non-recourse, contingency-based advances precisely because of the risk involved.

How do lawsuit loans plaintiffs?

Before Montana’s 15% rate cap made funding economically unviable, pre-settlement advances gave injured plaintiffs a vital financial lifeline while their cases moved slowly through the courts.

The funding allowed them to:

  • Pay ongoing medical bills and necessary treatment without going into debt
  • Cover daily living expenses and household bills
  • Replace lost wages when injuries prevented them from working
  • Avoid the desperate pressure to accept lowball insurance settlement offers simply to survive

Because the advances were non-recourse, plaintiffs kept full control of their cases and could negotiate from a position of strength instead of financial weakness. This leveled the playing field against well-funded insurance companies and helped many Montana families receive fair compensation for their injuries.

Today, with virtually no funders willing to operate under the state’s bank-like rate restrictions, that critical support has disappeared.

Pre-settlement loans over $5,000

How does the  lawsuit funding process work where available?

process 1

Apply for funding

A plaintiff applies online and provides basic data including their lawyer's contact.

process 2

24 hour evaluation

Underwriting discusses the case with their attorney by getting the necessary details about the lawsuit.

process 3

Funding agreement

To receive the approved settlement funds, both plaintiff and the attorney must sign the legal funding agreement.

process 4

Receive your money

The funds are then wired to the plaintiff's bank account. They also have the choice to receive their settlement advance by check.

What happens to injured plaintiffs in Montana without pre-settlement funding?

When pre-settlement funding is unavailable, injured plaintiffs are left to bear the full financial burden while their cases drag on for months or even years. Without that critical cash advance, most face:

  • Inability to pay medical bills, rent, utilities, groceries, or car payments
  • Pressure to return to work before they are healed, often worsening their injuries
  • Rapid accumulation of high-interest debt through credit cards, payday loans, or family borrowing
  • Forced acceptance of lowball settlement offers from insurance companies simply to stop the financial bleeding
  • Delayed or skipped medical treatment and physical therapy
  • Long-term damage including ruined credit, loss of housing, or even bankruptcy

This financial desperation gives insurance companies massive leverage. They know the plaintiff cannot afford to wait, so they routinely offer far less than the case is worth.

Real stats and facts on Montana personal injury cases.

Montana personal injury cases typically take several months to two years to resolve, with many lasting well over a year when serious injuries or disputes are involved.

Catastrophic injuries — such as traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord damage, paralysis, amputations, and severe burns — are especially common in medical malpractice, truck accidents, and workplace incidents. These cases drive the highest settlements because of lifelong medical care, lost earning capacity, and permanent disability.

Key numbers:

  • Catastrophic injury settlements nationally average $500,000 – $25 million+ (spinal cord paralysis: $1M–$25M+; severe TBI: $800K–$15M+).
  • Truck accidents: Catastrophic and fatal cases routinely exceed $1 million and often reach several million dollars.
  • Medical malpractice: National average payout ≈ $420K–$463K; catastrophic cases are significantly higher.
  • Work accidents in Montana: In 2024, businesses reported 13,200 OSHA-recordable nonfatal injuries and illnesses.

For comparison

Nationally (and consistent with Montana trends):

  • The average personal injury claim takes 11.4 months to settle.
  • Only 4% of personal injury cases go to trial — the vast majority settle out of court.
  • The average personal injury settlement is approximately $52,900, though serious cases can be significantly higher.

These timelines and costs create enormous financial pressure on injured plaintiffs who are unable to work, face mounting medical bills, and still have everyday living expenses.

These long timelines and massive costs create overwhelming financial pressure on injured plaintiffs — exactly why pre-settlement funding was so important before the regulations made it unavailable.

For deeper empirical evidence on how financial constraints affect plaintiff outcomes and settlement values, see this University of Chicago Law & Economics study.

Conclusion: a clear win for insurance companies — at the expense of injured Montanans.

Montana’s 15% annual rate cap has effectively eliminated pre-settlement funding for injured plaintiffs, protecting inssurance companies. What was once a critical lifeline that allowed families to survive long legal battles and fight for fair compensation is now gone.

The result is predictable: financially desperate plaintiffs accept lowball settlements, while insurance companies keep more money in their pockets. Catastrophic injuries from medical malpractice, truck crashes, and workplace accidents — which already carry the highest costs and longest timelines — leave families devastated without the financial bridge they once had.

In states like California, New York, Florida, Texas, Louisiana, Georgia, and New Mexico, litigation funders routinely provide advances at competitive market rates because the regulations allow them to price the actual risk of the case. Plaintiffs in those states can use funding to cover bills and negotiate from strength.

Montana’s 15% cap and 25% recovery limit eliminate that option. The law effectively shuts down the funding market, leaving injured Montanans with far fewer or no alternative tools than plaintiffs in nearly every other state.