Almost all personal injury cases stem from some form of negligence. The negligence may have been committed from a deliberate act or an omission to act in a specific manner. This could include making an uninformed, wrong decision or working unreasonably.
However, one thing common in all of such scenarios is that the harm suffered was never the intended or desired outcome. Strikingly different from this, intentional torts are acts where the perpetrator of harm had purposefully intended the victim to suffer from such harm. Either the harm inflicted is precisely what was intended or is greater in severity than what the accused wanted to happen. The malice on the perpetrator’s part is enough to establish that the injury caused was out of an intentional tort.
Kinds of intentional torts
A lot of generic offenses can be committed as intentional torts. Assault, battery, trespass, and sexual misconduct are some of the most common physical torts done with the end injury sustained as a motive.
Slander and libel as part of a defamatory campaign also involve the person being conscious and aware of the consequences that these can lead for the victim, hence oral torts committed with malicious intent.
A person who violates a private space, or obtains access to someone else’s personal data, or breaches a fiduciary duty can also be held accountable for committing a tortious act with the intent to cause what has been generated.
The distinction between accidental and intentional injury
There lies a fine line distinguishing accidental injury from those arising out of intentional torts. While the actions and the end result might be the same in two different acts of social wrong, the recorded state of the perpetrator’s mind is what majorly determines whether a tort was intentional or not.
Driving recklessly does have its own risks of injuring pedestrians or other motorists on the road. On the other hand, chasing someone down the road to hit and kill and making it look like a road accident are two different things. In such torts or acts, the mental state of the perpetrator or alleged planter of the injury matters a lot.
Intended harm pre-settlement funding
The claimant hence must establish that the perpetrator had malicious schemes and motives. Intentional torts thus can be greatly difficult to contest in a lawsuit for personal injuries. It is hence advisable to engage an expert counsel to look after your case.
While the lawyer tries to find a way into the jungle of facts and figures to establish the intentional tort requisite, victims of intended harm can take care of their finances by applying today for pre-settlement funding.
Severe injuries resulting from intended harm are often grave. They render the person unable to enjoy a quality of life. In such circumstances, the victim turned plaintiff may need external financial support to contest a civil suit for compensation for the injuries he had suffered. Here, Baker Street funding’s lawsuit funding program for intentional torts can be of much help in such cases. The plaintiffs can obtain an instant cash advance against their future unrealized award of damages or settlement from the intended harm suit. Once the lawsuit is concluded successfully, the borrowed amount can then be returned to the funding company.
Victims looking to seek advantage from pre-settlement funding can now contact (888) 711-3599.
